Comments on: wcit2008.com or wcit.com?

By: pin

pin — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:30:57 +0000

Interesting, who should be the right party to pay for the renewal of those domain names in the future? Interesting!

By: NaS

NaS — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 09:28:49 +0000

To counter the suggestion:-

1. Domain names are cheap nowadays. Who cares about RM50 (or less) when the budget is in 5-6 digit for the web project?

2. Different year event might be run/owned by different entities/companies, so, domain ownership transfer might not of the best interest to involved parties. It all depends on content & structure ownership agreement between site developer, event manager and organizing company. History matters.

3. Sometimes it’s a good idea to have separate domains as to remove direct relations to separate events/managements to compare them. After all, you have tons of different domains yourself for each distinct (or not-so-distinct) topic.

By: marcus

marcus — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:40:00 +0000

Some of them don’t bother to know.. some of them don’t want to know, because if they do, they’d be slapping their own face and throw away a chance to gain big bucks.

By: clarence

clarence — Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:42:55 +0000

Bill boards only create exposure…not impact.
It’s no longer dynamic like blogs and costly. If any problem to occur such as this wcit.com , it would only lead to mis-information to the public.

By: Yow Chuan

Yow Chuan — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:49:33 +0000

This is adopting the “Short-term Strategy for Long-term Failure ;-)

That’s why no matter how many billions of ringgit you give these clowns, they will use them up in these inefficient advertising.

Well, what do they care? It’s the tax-payers money anyway.

Looking on the brightside, at least they might not be holding the event in 2009, hence the wcit2008.org